Global crop modelers and IIASA scientists joined forces to explore the potential impacts of nuclear winter resulting from hypothetical nuclear detonations on food systems and food security.

Nuclear winter is a severe global weather disturbance following a hypothetical nuclear conflict, expected to last for approximately 10-15 years. It is caused by black carbon from urban fires — ignited by warhead detonations — rising into the atmosphere, shading, cooling, and drying it. Although the possibility of nuclear war is an improbable worst case scenario, researchers seek to explore the potential consequences it could have and spread awareness about its devastating cascading effects.

Past climate-crop modeling studies show that these climatic changes could put large portions of the human population at risk of starvation due to crop losses. This past research, however, does not fully account for the wide range of uncertainties in crop model responses under different intensities of climate disruption, nor does it consider compounding disruptions of agricultural inputs, such as fertilizer, seed, labor, or the potential and limitations of short-term adaptation strategies (e.g., changing growing seasons or crop types).

The Advanced Ensemble Projections for Indirect Impacts of Nuclear Conflict in Global Food Systems (ANFOS) project is part of a new initiative, reflecting a collaborative effort among global crop modelers to develop new projections of the potential impacts nuclear winter could have on global food production. This collaborative effort aims to provide a comprehensive picture of how nuclear winter, combined with supply chain disruptions, could affect global food security.

Led by Christian Folberth, a Senior Researcher in the IIASA Agriculture, Forestry and Ecosystem Services Research Group, the project seeks to fill the gaps in past research on this topic, working in close collaboration with the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) initiative and climate modeling groups.

“This community effort will simulate the climatic effects of nuclear conflict on global crop production under different nuclear winter intensity scenarios considering compounding impacts on food security and potentials for mitigation to provide critical insights into the consequences such a catastrophic event could have,” explains Folberth.

This analysis will provide by far the most comprehensive assessment of potential impacts nuclear winter could have on crop production and the available option space for adaptation under the working hypotheses that adaptation potential is limited, and supply chain disruptions may substantially exacerbate impacts already at lower intensities.

News

Dreamstime_171340883

01 October 2026

Where the waters meet: Connecting global limits and local water management

Human activity and climate change are putting growing pressure on water resources, disrupting the predictability of the water cycle, and changing the availability and quality of freshwater. IIASA researchers and partners have developed a new framework for guiding water management and planning at the river-basin level, derived from the existing Global Water Planetary Boundary.
World map showing hubs and connections

21 September 2026

Fairness informs how the world cuts emissions

Who cuts emissions fastest, and who supports others do so, are central questions in global climate action. New IIASA-led research shows that building fairness into climate models from the start can inform deliberations without changing the overall climate goal.
Engineer monitoring renewable energy: solar panels, wind turbines, and hydrogen storage

07 September 2026

Investing in climate and clean air action can deliver 15-fold returns

Every US$1 invested in tackling climate change and air pollution together can generate around US$15 in economic benefits, according to a report published today by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). This is higher than tackling climate and clean air separately and includes both market and non-market economic gains.