Global crop modelers and IIASA scientists joined forces to explore the potential impacts of nuclear winter resulting from hypothetical nuclear detonations on food systems and food security.

Nuclear winter is a severe global weather disturbance following a hypothetical nuclear conflict, expected to last for approximately 10-15 years. It is caused by black carbon from urban fires — ignited by warhead detonations — rising into the atmosphere, shading, cooling, and drying it. Although the possibility of nuclear war is an improbable worst case scenario, researchers seek to explore the potential consequences it could have and spread awareness about its devastating cascading effects.

Past climate-crop modeling studies show that these climatic changes could put large portions of the human population at risk of starvation due to crop losses. This past research, however, does not fully account for the wide range of uncertainties in crop model responses under different intensities of climate disruption, nor does it consider compounding disruptions of agricultural inputs, such as fertilizer, seed, labor, or the potential and limitations of short-term adaptation strategies (e.g., changing growing seasons or crop types).

The Advanced Ensemble Projections for Indirect Impacts of Nuclear Conflict in Global Food Systems (ANFOS) project is part of a new initiative, reflecting a collaborative effort among global crop modelers to develop new projections of the potential impacts nuclear winter could have on global food production. This collaborative effort aims to provide a comprehensive picture of how nuclear winter, combined with supply chain disruptions, could affect global food security.

Led by Christian Folberth, a Senior Researcher in the IIASA Agriculture, Forestry and Ecosystem Services Research Group, the project seeks to fill the gaps in past research on this topic, working in close collaboration with the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) initiative and climate modeling groups.

“This community effort will simulate the climatic effects of nuclear conflict on global crop production under different nuclear winter intensity scenarios considering compounding impacts on food security and potentials for mitigation to provide critical insights into the consequences such a catastrophic event could have,” explains Folberth.

This analysis will provide by far the most comprehensive assessment of potential impacts nuclear winter could have on crop production and the available option space for adaptation under the working hypotheses that adaptation potential is limited, and supply chain disruptions may substantially exacerbate impacts already at lower intensities.

News

Bucharest, Romania - July 02, 2019: 43 degrees celsius 109. 4 fahrenheit is the temperature displayed by a digital thermometer on a hot summer day

06 November 2026

“Mega heatwaves” strengthened by interaction between soil moisture, atmospheric pressure, and temperature

A new study has found a self-reinforcing interaction between temperature, soil moisture, and atmospheric pressure is being triggered at high temperatures, making extreme heatwaves 10% hotter than they would otherwise be. 

Unidentified man voting

26 October 2026

Extreme weather drives support for green voting in Europe

A new study co-authored by IIASA researchers Jonas Peisker, Roman Hoffmann, and Raya Muttarak has found that extreme heatwaves are changing how Europeans feel about climate change and influencing their voting choices. The results highlight the demographic heterogeneity of the effects and could provide valuable insights for policymakers, communicators, and advocates aiming to enhance climate action legitimacy and engagement across diverse populations in the region.

dreamstime_l_17712570

16 October 2026

Getting back on track to reduce methane emissions

A new study, led by IIASA researchers and coauthored by UNEP colleagues, finds that if governments fully implement their methane reduction plans, they could reduce global emissions by 11% between 2020 and 2030. This would reverse the current trend of increasing methane emissions, but would not be sufficient to achieve the goal of the Global Methane Pledge.