Consecutive heat extremes across crop growing stages sharply reduce yields across staple crops in the US and Europe under climate change. Without climate action, such events will become ten times more frequent, while most of the damage can be avoided by limiting warming to 1.5 °C, according to a study led by Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ETH Zurich, and IIASA.

When heat hits twice

As the climate warms, extreme weather increasingly occurs in sequence. The study led by Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam, ETH Zurich, and IIASA, together with coauthors from institutions across Europe and the United States and published in Environmental Research Letters, shows that such back-to-back heat events pose a serious threat to global food production.

The study shows that early-season heat can raise yield potential but leaves crops more vulnerable to subsequent heatwaves during the flowering period. Across maize, soybean, wheat, and barley in the US and Europe, spring heat leads to 5–55 % larger losses from summer heat, compared to years with average spring conditions.

“Early heat can act like a double-edged sword,” says Carmen B. Steinmann, environmental scientist at ETH Zurich. “While it may boost yield potential at first, it leaves crops far more vulnerable when summer heat strikes,” adds Raed Hamed, postdoctoral researcher at the VU Amsterdam.

Rising risks, avoidable losses

“Today, warm springs generally benefit yields, but this could change”, explains Raed Hamed, lead author of the study. “Under high-emission scenarios, we project that additional yield losses from sequential heat will offset potential benefits of warmer springs.”

By the end of the century, sequential heat events could become up to ten times more frequent if emissions remain high. Accounting for this interaction increases projected yield losses by an additional 2–44%, offsetting potential benefits of warmer springs. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C reduces projected losses to just 1–6%.

“Our results underline how crucial rapid climate action is to avoid societal impacts from increasingly complex climate risks,” emphasizes IIASA senior research scholar Kai Kornhuber.

Insights for resilient food systems

The study highlights the need to consider compounding climate extremes to strengthen food system resilience. By bridging detailed physiological insights from laboratory experiments with large-scale statistical analysis, it also provides guidance for climate adaptation planning.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae06b8 © Source: Environmental Research Letters

Reference

Hamed, R., Steinmann, C.B., Ma, Q., Balanzategui, D., Broadman, E., Lesk, C., Kornhuber, K. (2025). Amplified agricultural impacts from more frequent and intense sequential heat events. Environmental Research Letters DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae06b8

News

Using less, living better

19 June 2026

Using less, living better: Demand-side climate action wins public support

A new IIASA-led study finds that climate strategies that cut energy and resource demand tend to improve quality of life across a broader range of dimensions than supply-side alternatives and shows that communicating these wider benefits can strengthen public support.
CircEUlar - CIRCOMOD - CO2NSTRUCT Final Conference

18 June 2026

Bridging Research and Policy on Circular Economy Pathways to Net-Zero

Reflections on how circular economy modelling research can better inform policy for the transition to net-zero
Environmental Scientist Monitoring Climate Data, Blurred global maps and charts emphasize the scale of environmental monitoring and research.

27 May 2026

Temporary carbon removal could help support climate goals

Persistent methane emissions from sectors such as agriculture and growing debates over the credibility of carbon offsets are creating new challenges for governments and companies pursuing net-zero commitments. New research suggests temporary carbon storage may have a scientifically valid role in helping support climate goals, if used in the right way.