Amid an alarming surge in global habitat destruction and species extinction, new research by an international team of scientists proposes a new global approach to choosing protected lands which could reduce species extinction risk twice as efficiently as current methods.

Protecting key ecosystems and habitats is widely accepted as being one of the most important actions to address species extinction. However, a point of contention arises when trying to calculate ecological value and to decide which areas are prioritized for protection first, to provide maximum benefit to the greatest number of at-risk species. The study argues that current land prioritization practices fall short, excluding localized data fundamental to understanding how a species interacts with the habitats in its global distribution.

“The global extinction of a species begins locally, occurring one population at a time, and individual populations can be more or less resilient depending on regional factors like land use or management intensity,” explains lead author Nicholas Wolff, Director of Climate Science at The Nature Conservancy (TNC). “We need a prioritization model that reflects those core tenets of ecology.”

The coalition of researchers sought to prove there was a better and more effective approach that governments and practitioners allocating lands for conservation could use in the future. Rather than determine land prioritization based solely on species range and richness – as has historically been the case – the study modeled what would happen if conservationists also incorporated population-level info, such as the growth rates and habitat needs of every individual population of a species, focusing on terrestrial mammal species. The results were eye-opening.

’’We found that 80% of the planet’s ‘priority habitats for persistence’ – in other words, the areas that mammals threatened with extinction depend upon most for their survival – are not currently protected and only 7.9% is strictly protected,’’ notes study coauthor Piero Visconti, who leads the Biodiversity, Ecology, and Conservation Research Group in the IIASA Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study where the identified priority areas maximize not just global biodiversity representation, but also persistence at this spatial scale and detail,” adds Heini Kujala, coauthor and University Researcher at the Finnish Natural History Museum. “We hope the findings encourage innovation in conservation strategies worldwide and contribute to the global fightback against accelerating extinctions rates.”

The study, published in One Earth, identified a number of habitats where strengthening existing conservation protections has potential to bring about a significant reduction in global extinction risk for a greater number of species. Notably, the results show that just seven countries – Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mexico, and Papua New Guinea – contain over half of Earth’s surviving priority habitats for species persistence, providing ample potential for trialing the new approach proposed by this study. 

The results are already being put to use at TNC, the largest biodiversity conservation NGO globally, helping to pinpoint “Last Chance Ecosystems”, prioritize conservation focal areas, and inform strategy organization-wide.

Graph and map depicting priority habitats © Wolff et al.

The paper was published just one month shy of the first anniversary of the UN’s Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), which included ambitious commitments to ensure urgent management actions to halt human induced extinction of known threatened species.

“There is currently a gap between the biodiversity targets the international community has committed to and the current scale of global conservation. This research will hopefully enable nations to reach their conservation targets faster and curb declines in their native mammal species populations more effectively, getting us one step closer to closing the gap and achieving the ambitious targets set by the United Nations in the GBF,” says senior author Eddie Game, senior lead scientist at TNC.

The study was authored in collaboration with scientists from TNC, IIASA, the University of Helsinki, the Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems of the National Research Council (CNR-IRET), Radboud University, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), University College London, the University of Melbourne, Sapienza University of Rome, and the University of Queensland.

Adapted from a press release authored by The Nature Conservancy.

Wolff, N., Visconti, P., Kujala, H., Santini, L., Hilbers, J., Possingham, H., Oakleaf, J., Kennedy, C., Kiesecker, J., Fargione, J., & Game, E. (2023). Prioritizing global land protection for population persistence can double the efficiency of habitat protection for reducing mammal extinction risk. One Earth. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.001


African school girl posing at a school desk with pen and paper

04 December 2023

Filling data gaps to assess the role of education in fertility decline

IIASA researchers have introduced an innovative methodology for reconstructing data on fertility and education, particularly in developing countries with inconsistent or unreliable data sets.
beautiful autumn panorama of the Carpathians Ukraine-lake, forest.

29 November 2023

Setting out priority areas of cooperation and concrete action for Ukraine’s forests

Modern, target-oriented research and quality education, more exchange with international peers and partners, better science-policy interaction, and improved coordination and communication with international and national actors are crucial for ensuring a sustainable future of Ukraine’s forests.
AI generated image in the shape of a water drop - concept of scarce resources

28 November 2023

How can we evaluate the quality of global water models?

IIASA researchers contributed to a new international study that tested the extent to which global water models agree with each other and with observational data. Using a new evaluation approach, the researchers can show in which climate regions the models agree and where they differ.