According to the authors of a new study published in Nature, rising nitrous oxide emissions are putting reaching climate goals and the objectives of the Paris Agreement in jeopardy.

The growing use of nitrogen fertilizers in the production of food worldwide is increasing  concentrations of nitrous oxide in the atmosphere—a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide and which remains in the atmosphere longer than a human lifetime.

The study, which was undertaken by an international consortium of 57 scientists from 14 countries and 48 research institutions, with IIASA in a key role, was led by Auburn University Alabama, USA under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project and the International Nitrogen Initiative. The researchers’ objective was to produce the most comprehensive assessment to date of all sources and sinks of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide. 

The findings point to an alarming trend affecting climate change: Nitrous oxide has risen 20% from pre-industrial levels and its growth has accelerated over recent decades due to emissions from various human activities.

“The dominant driver of the increase in atmospheric nitrous oxide comes from agriculture, and the growing demand for food and feed for animals will further increase global nitrous oxide emissions,” explains study lead author Hanqin Tian, director of the International Center for Climate and Global Change Research at Auburn University’s School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences and Andrew Carnegie Fellow. “There is a conflict between the way we are feeding people and stabilizing the climate."

Simplified_N2O-Budget_Figure_FINAL_Corrected © Nature; Global Carbon Project (GCP) and International Nitrogen Initiative (INI).

The global nitrous oxide budget for 2007–2016. The colored arrows represent nitrous oxide fluxes (in Tg N yr−1 for 2007–2016) as follows: yellow, emissions from anthropogenic sources (agriculture and waste water, biomass burning, fossil fuel and industry,

The study also determined that the largest contributors to global nitrous oxide emissions
come from East Asia, South Asia, Africa, and South America. Emissions from synthetic
fertilizers dominate releases in China, India, and the US, while emissions from the
application of livestock manure as fertilizer dominates releases in Africa and South America,
the study found. The highest growth rates in emissions are found in emerging economies,
particularly Brazil, China, and India, where crop production and livestock numbers have
increased. The most surprising result of the study was, however, that current trends in
nitrous oxide emissions are not compatible with pathways consistent to achieve the climate
goals of the Paris Agreement.

“Current emissions are tracking global temperature increases above 3°C, twice the
temperature target of the Paris Agreement,” said study coauthor Robert Jackson, a professor
and coauthor from Stanford University and chair of the Global Carbon Project.

According to study coauthor Wilfried Winiwarter, a senior research scholar in the IIASA Air
Quality and Greenhouse Gases Program and former director of the International Nitrogen
Initiative’s European center, opportunities to reduce nitrous oxide emissions do however
exist.

“Europe is the only region in the world that has successfully reduced nitrous oxide emissions
over the past two decades,” he says. “Industrial and agricultural policies to reduce
greenhouse gases and air pollution and to optimize fertilizer use efficiencies have proven to
be effective. Still, further efforts will be required, in Europe as well as globally."

“This study shows that we now have a comprehensive understanding of the nitrous oxide
budget, including climate impacts,” adds study co-lead Rona Thompson, a senior scientist
from the Norwegian Institute for Air Research. “We are able to assess and quantify measures
to reduce nitrous oxide emissions, and many of these measures will also improve water and
air quality, benefiting both human health and ecosystems.”

Study co-leader Josep “Pep” Canadell, chief scientist in the Climate Science Center at the
Australia-based Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and
executive director of the Global Carbon Project, agrees that the research is significant and
urgent.

“This new analysis calls for a full-scale rethink in the ways we use and abuse nitrogen
fertilizers globally and urges us to adopt more sustainable practices in the way we produce
food, including the reduction of food waste,” he notes. “These findings underscore the
urgency and opportunities to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions worldwide to avoid the worst
of climate impacts."

Adapted from a press release prepared by Auburn University, Alabama, USA.

Reference:

Tian H, Xu R, Canadell JG, Thompson RL, Winiwarter W, Suntharalingam P, Davidson EA, Ciais P, et al. (2020). A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0

News

Group of refugees outlined against the setting sun.

17 March 2025

Addressing the needs of vulnerable populations unable to move away from climate risk areas

People in informal settlements, urban deprived areas, refugee camps, prisons, and war zones can be particularly vulnerable to climate threats and natural hazards. A new study, led by IIASA researchers, explores how policymakers can ease their burden.
Rethinking electricity demand

06 February 2025

Rethinking energy demand can foster sustainable development and reduce emissions from buildings and transport

In a new study, IIASA scientists show that a mix of policy measures, including both technological solutions and behavioral changes, can significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from energy use in buildings and transport.
Selfie portrait of girls at a university campus

05 February 2025

Gender equality is crucial for a climate resilient future

A new IIASA study shows why gender equality trends should be central when planning how societies adapt to and mitigate climate change. A society where women have little access to decision-making or finance or have less education, will be ill-equipped to find and implement solutions, ranging from concrete measures like irrigation or crop rotation, to behavior shifts and engineering the energy transition. We need to ask the “what-if” questions related to progress towards equality or deterioration of inequality. One thing is clear: gender inequality will have a high price if neglected.