
Since 1999 IIASA has been hosting the Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM), one of the four centres assigned for the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution.
CIAM prepares technical background material for the annual meetings of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling (TFIAM). The Task Force brings together information gathered from the Parties and from other Convention bodies on cost-effective emission control strategies. Its regular reports to the negotiating bodies of the Convention assist - through computer models - in the development of legal instruments (protocols).

Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling (TFIAM) under the LRTAP Convention
The Task Force’s combines information produced by the various scientific working groups of the LRTAP Convention and through computer models assist in the development of legal instruments. Read more
Reports, Presentations and Data related to the Gothenburg Protocol Revision
At its 61st meeting (Geneva, 4-6 September 2023), the Working Group on Strategies and Review requested a policy brief on the potential implications of introducing collective risk-based targets for the UNECE region to address air pollution impacts on health and ecosystems. Such a document is being jointly prepared by the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling and the Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM). An overview of the comments received on an early draft, the latest revised version (4 November 2024) of the policy brief and country emissions by GNFR sector, are available below:
- Draft guidance document on non-technical measures (draft, 18 October 2024)
- Overview of comments on earlier version of the Policy Brief (July 2024)
- Policy brief on potential targets to reduce risks for health and ecosystems
- Country emission totals and summaries by GNFR sector (3 February 2025: includes optimized scenarios and revised MTFR)
- Country emissions by GNFR sector (3 February 2025: includes optimized scenarios and revised MTFR)
Informal Delegates Meeting of the CLRTAP WGSR
Leuven, 21-24 October 2024
List of Presentations |
|
Session A | |
Relevant issues from TFTEI meeting and BAT workshop of 15-17 October in Paris | Jean-Guy Bartaire, CITEPA/ENEA |
Key conclusions of TFTEI analysis on technological pathways towards ratification of the present Gothenburg Protocol; analysis of priority sectors | Nadine Allemand, CITEPA |
Non-Party data including priority sectors, reduction potential, activity data, emissions and effects, and scenarios | Zig Klimont, IIASA |
Feedback on discussions to date with non-parties (including past brainstorming sessions) | Peter Meulepas |
Comments by Georgia on the revision process (oral communication) | Noe Megrelishvili |
Update on workplan item 1.2.2 on workshop to stimulate national integrated assessment capacities of non-Parties in March 2025 | European Commission |
Session B | |
Present role of guidance documents and annexes in the Gothenburg protocol | Peter Meulepas |
Value of information on best available techniques and practices available for the Convention, the GP revision and beyond the UNECE region | Nadine Allemand, CITEPA |
Status of the latest guidance documents on non-technical measures, the cost-of-inaction document | Stefan Åström. TFIAM Co-Chair |
Session C | |
From joint ambitions to emission reduction commitments; how models can help | Rob Maas, TFIAM expert advisor |
Developments since WGSR62 | Zig Klimont, IIASA |
Recommendations from the policy brief | Simone Schucht, TFIAM Co-Chair |
Session D | |
International targets on N emission reductions and options to include / refer to them in a revised GP; development of emissions of NH3 (and NOx) vs. other pollutants; effects on health and ecosystems | Mark Sutton |
Nitrogen management as established within CLRTAP and its use for reducing air pollution; nitrogen budgets as a policy tool | Wilfried Winiwarter / Markus Geupel, IIASA |
Food consumption patterns and policies as a case study for non-technical / structural measures, and (partial?) implementation into GAINS via the LOW scenario | Adrian Leip |
Session E | |
Summary presentation from WGSR62 | Tim Butler |
Rationale for addressing methane for reducing transboundary ozone | Hilde Fagerli, NMI |
Methane mitigation options | Zig Klimont, IIASA |
Options and methane outline provided by the co-chairs | Dominique Pritula, Vice-Chair |