06 October 2020 - 09 October 2020
Ufa, Russia / Virtual
Information technologies and their usage in social media
Misinformation in social media is an actual and contested policy problem given its outreach and the variety of stakeholders involved. In particular, increased social media use makes the spread of misinformation almost ubiquitous.
The presentation of Nadejda Komendantova on "Information technologies and their usage in social media" includes a framework for evaluating tools that detect misinformation using a preference elicitation approach as well as an integrated decision analytic process that will evaluate desirable features of systems to combat misinformation. The framework was tested in three countries (Austria, Greece, and Sweden) with three groups of stakeholders (policymakers, journalists, and citizens).
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is the methodological basis for this research. The results show that participants prioritized information regarding the actors behind the distribution of misinformation and tracing the lifecycle of misinformative posts. Another important criterion was whether someone intended to delude others, which shows a preference for trust, accountability, and quality in, for instance, journalism. It is also important how misinformation travels. However, all criteria that involved active contributions to dealing with misinformation were ranked low in importance, which shows that participants may not have felt personally involved enough in the subject or situation. The results also show that differences in preferences are explained by the cultural background of the participants, and that should perhaps be considered in the further development of tools.
Last edited: 22 December 2020
Kyza, E.A., Varda, C., Panos, D., Karageorgiou, M., Komendantova, N. , Perfumi, S.C., Shah, S.I.H., & Hosseini, A.S. (2020). Combating misinformation online: re-imagining social media for policy-making. Internet Policy Review 9 (4) 10.14763/2020.4.1514.
Danielson, M. & Ekenberg, L. (2020). A Framework for Categorising and Evaluating Tools for e-Democracy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 18 (1), 69-82.
Ekenberg, L. , Danielson, M., & Komendantova, N. (2020). A decision evaluation tool: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis as Co-Creation Methodology. IIASA
Rovenskaya, E. , Aghababaei Samani, K., Baklanov, A. , Ermolieva, T., Folberth, C. , Fritz, S., Hadi, H., Javalera Rincón, V. , et al. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Systems Analysis of the 21st Century. IIASA Working Paper. Laxenburg, Austria: WP-19-010
de Almeida, A.T., Ekenberg, L. , Leyva Lopez, J.C., & Morais, D.C. (2019). Building Mathematical Models for Multicriteria and Multiobjective Applications 2019. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2019, e9147291. 10.1155/2019/9147291.
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313